UK Upholds UWO Against Wife of Jailed Azeri Banker

The United Kingdom’s maximum courtroom docket has brushed off a utility via way of means of the spouse of a jailed Azerbaijani banker in opposition to a prison order requiring her to reveal how she received high-priced houses inside the US.
The UK Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the NCA in its case against Zamira Hajiyeva (Photo: NCA)

Zamira Hajiyeva, who in 2018 has become a challenge of the US’s first-ever Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO), is now compelled to offer investigators statistics concerning her buy of a luxurious Knightsbridge mansion in London and a golfing route inside the county of Berkshire.

Graeme Biggar, a senior reputable on the National Crime Agency, the authority pursuing the order, welcomed the “massive result” as a crucial step in organizing the tremendously new measures “as an effective device for monetary investigations.”

“There aren’t any in addition routes for Mrs. Hajiyeva to enchantment in opposition to the order,” he stated in an emailed announcement on Monday, including that the current ruling “will set a beneficial precedent for destiny UWO cases.”

Introduced to an awful lot of fanfare in 2018, UWOs are civil orders in opposition to high-price property that require the proprietors of these holdings to reveal to the government how the gadgets got here into their possession.

Related Posts

Contrary to famous belief, the measures aren’t designed as a punishment in and of themselves, alternatively serving as a fact-locating device that could later function as a foundation for confiscation.

It changed extensively was hoping that UWOs might assist treatment the United Kingdom’s worldwide recognition as a key transit and vacation spot us of a for grimy cash.

According to anti-corruption watchdog and OCCRP companion Transparency International, the government estimate that an extra of £one hundred billion (US$one hundred thirty billion) is laundered via the U.K. every 12 months via way of means of corrupt officials, rogue states, and transnational organized crime networks.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of the NCA in its case in opposition to Hajiyeva follows simply months after the business enterprise extensively utilized a UWO to steady a forfeiture agreement with Mansoor ‘Manni’ Mahmood Hussain. The Birmingham businessman has no crook record, however is said to preserve near ties with important nearby organized crime figures.

These current successes have additionally come warm at the heels of an embarrassing defeat for the authority. Earlier in April, the High Court dominated in opposition to UWOs submitted via way of means of the business enterprise in opposition to 3 London mansions, in the end, belonging to spouse and children of Nursultan Nazarbeyev, former president of Kazakhstan.

According to the judge, the NCA had did not offer the best proof that the houses have been in all likelihood to had been bought with cash of illicit starting place.

However, a next joint probe among The Times newspaper and investigative journalism outfit SourceMaterial found out that the own circle of relatives had additionally allegedly received houses on London’s Baker Street — domestic of the well-known fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes — and that those might also additionally had been bought with grimy cash lively out of Kazakhstan via shell corporations inside the Caribbean.

The NCA stated at the time of the current ruling that it intends to enchantment in opposition to the courtroom docket’s decision. The own circle of relatives has formerly advised in an emailed announcement they felt “vindicated” via way of means of that result, which they stated verified that “the NCA received the Orders on an erroneous foundation as a part of an unsuitable research which changed into totally without merit.”

Regarding next press findings at the starting place of the own circle of relatives’ wealth, legal professionals allegedly advised SourceMaterial that “any proposal the patron misled the courtroom docket withinside the current UWO court cases is totally untrue.”

OCCRP / TechConflict.Com

Contact Us